Web Masters please use this
button to link back to this site

Good News Stories


Queensland Tourism Industry Council CEO – Protection zones are good

Moreton Bay scientists praise Protection Zone benefits
Marine agency praised for Reef protection and education
Fish flourish in Green Zones
LONG-TERM MONITORING REVEALS MORE FISH IN THE SEA – Green zones
Australian Marine Science Association - supports protection zones
260 European Marine Scientists Support Protection Zones


Queensland Tourism Industry Council CEO – Protection zones are good

Daniel Gschwind, CEO of the Queensland Tourism Industry Council points out that the toughening of protection zones in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in recent years has had no negative impact on boating or fishing, and both fishing and recreational use of the park have increased. "I don't believe the government has any intention of locking off the bay – that is scaremongering on an alarming scale," he says. "Moreton Bay has to be managed sensibly for the future, and part of that management has to look at zoning and non-fishing zones as one of many management tools. It's an incredible asset for all of us. We're all on the same side."

Reference – The Courier Mail - Q Weekend 22 September 2007


Moreton Bay scientists praise Protection Zone benefits

Research recently undertaken by the University of Queensland at two of the fishing-free ‘protection zones’ in place in Moreton Bay Marine Park indicate that they actually work! Researchers have shown that protection zones:

  • Increase the size and abundance of fished species
  • Enhance production of offspring
  • Provide refuge for vulnerable species

Source - Pillans S, Pillans RD, Johnstone RW, Kraft PG, Haywood MDE, Possingham HP (2005) Effects of marine reserve protection on the mud crab (Scylla serrata) in a sex-biased fishery in subtropical Australia, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Col, 293: 201-213
Read More ...


Marine agency praised for Reef protection and education
4 June 2007

Protecting and educating students about the Great Barrier Reef has proved a recipe for success for a Queensland marine management agency that scooped a prestigious award at the weekend.

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) won the Excellence in Marine and Coastal Management Award at the United Nations Association of Australia World Environment Day Awards 2007. GBRMPA Chairman Virginia Chadwick said the national award recognised the agency’s high standard in environment impact management, planning and education.

“Winning this award is fantastic in acknowledging how marine and coastal management is helping ensure the future of the Great Barrier Reef,” she said.

“For more than thirty years, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has been the custodian of this national treasure on behalf of all Australians.

“Our Planning and Environmental Impact Management team play a key role in managing Reef activity, assessing environmental impacts, issuing permits and developing Plans of Management that provide protection for high-use areas.

“Our highly-successful Reef Guardian Schools programme is also helping build a new generation of environmental stewards passionately committed to protecting the Reef.”

More than 100 schools and 52 000 students participate in the highly successful programme that aims to achieve a sustainable future of the environment and Great Barrier Reef.

Students are involved in a range of environmental projects including revegetating wetlands, recycling and conducting beach clean-ups.

Ms Chadwick said the award recognised the value of this programme and the agency’s partnership with industry and local government.

“Community involvement is central to spreading the environmental message and building support for marine and coastal management,” Ms Chadwick said.

“Our close partnership with industry and local government is also proving invaluable in helping ensure the Marine Park is used and managed sustainably.”

On World Environment Day (5 June) the United Nations Association of Australia focuses attention on the environment and positive programmes that work towards protecting or restoring natural heritage.

The awards recognise the environmental effort of businesses, local governments, schools, community groups, individuals and the media and focus on the time-honoured theme: ‘think global, act local.’

Reference - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority - Marine agency praised for Reef protection and education


Fish flourish in Green Zones

New research has shown fish abundance has increased in Green Zones introduced under the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003.

Preliminary results indicate the Green Zones established in mid-2004 in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park are having a positive effect even faster than scientists expected.

The monitoring was initiated by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) as part of the monitoring of the Zoning Plan and was carried out by the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and James Cook University (JCU).

GBRMPA’s Regional Liaison Manager based in Townsville David Briggs said the AIMS Long-term Monitoring Team surveyed fish populations on the mid and outer shelf reefs in the Townsville region.

“Preliminary results from the offshore reefs have shown that an important fish species, coral trout, is now more abundant in the ‘no-take’ Green Zones,” Mr Briggs said.

AIMS Research Director Dr Peter Doherty said in the last 12 months AIMS surveyed fish populations on 26 reefs closed to fishing by the rezoning and 25 matched reefs that remained open to fishing. The surveys represent five geographic regions adjacent to coastal communities between Cairns and Gladstone.

“Although five reefs in the Townsville region will not be surveyed until September 2006, preliminary results based on seven reefs that have been done in the region show about twice as many coral trout on the unfished reefs.”

“Because we have seen a similar improvement in coral trout stocks in all the regions surveyed, we believe that this is a real result,” Dr Doherty said.

“It is exciting to see such clear results within two years of the Green Zones being implemented.”

Tackle World Townsville owner Danny Brooks said over the last two years the number and size of grunter has increased considerably in the local area.

“The Sand Island at Bowling Green Bay was once a hot spot for catching grunter and although this area is now a ‘no catch’ zone we have experienced some very good grunter fishing over the past two years outside of this zone.”

Reference - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority - Fish flourish in Green Zones


LONG-TERM MONITORING REVEALS MORE FISH IN THE SEA – Green zones

Researchers from the Australian Institute of Marine Science Long-term Monitoring Team (LTMT) have surveyed 100 reefs each year for the last 15 years to track the impact of disturbances such as cyclones, bleaching events, crown-of-thorns starfish, and coral disease. The scientists monitor the decline and recovery of coral reefs within an area larger than England.


Coral trout. Photo: A. Frisch

When the Great Barrier Reef Zoning Plan was introduced on 1 July 2004, it significantly increased the amount of habitat protected from fishing and provided a unique opportunity to determine how quickly reef fish stocks respond to reduced fishing pressure. The ‘no-take’ green zones established in the Zoning Plan are designed to create protected areas where fish can grow and mature. As the oldest and largest fish produce far more offspring than smaller individuals, the adults living in green zones are expected to add to the replenishment of populations on nearby reefs that remain open to fishing.

The AIMS LTMT has formed a partnership with researchers from James Cook University to assess changes in ecosystem biodiversity arising from the new Zoning Plan. The JCU team is surveying fish and corals on near-shore reefs while AIMS surveys the mid- and outer- shelf reefs.


The AIMS Long-term Monitoring Team spends an average of 100 days at sea,
visiting reefs from Cape York to the Capricorn Bunker to
monitor yearly changes on the Great Barrier Reef.
Photo: AIMS Long-term monitoring team.

In the last 12 months, AIMS surveyed fish populations on 26 reefs closed to fishing by the rezoning and 25 matched reefs that remained open to fishing, representing five geographic regions adjacent to coastal communities between Cairns and Gladstone. Although 5 reefs in the Townsville region will not be surveyed until September 2006, preliminary results from the offshore reefs have shown that an important fish species, coral trout, is now about 50% more abundant in the new ‘no-take’ green zones.

JCU scientists surveyed fish and coral populations on fringing reefs of the Whitsunday Islands. Before the rezoning in 2004 abundance of fish like coral trout and stripey sea perch were approximately the same on reefs open to fishing with those earmarked to be closed to fishing under the new zoning. Just under 2 years after the rezoning, both of these popular fisheries species were almost 60% more abundant on reefs closed than open to fishing.

AIMS Research Director, Dr Peter Doherty, is excited to see such clear results within two years of the changed management arrangements.

"The extent of the difference is quite surprising at this early stage but the consistency of the differences between zones in all of the places that were examined last year leaves me in no doubt that this is a real result".

JCU Professor Garry Russ was equally excited and surprised by such a rapid response of fish populations to the new zoning.

"The fact that we had data from sites in the Whitsundays before the zoning was implemented, and observed the differences in fish abundance between zones closed and open to fishing develop through time, is critical. The complementary results from both JCU and AIMS suggest a consistent result both offshore and inshore"


The AIMS LTMT test drives the new manta board design in its latest surveys.
Photo: AIMS Long-term monitoring team.

This finding adds to other demonstrations in Australia and elsewhere that marine protected areas can deliver direct benefits to a regional fish stock, assisting managers to keep fishing pressure at levels that are ecologically sustainable. In developing countries, where the human pressures are much greater, marine protected areas appear to be the most cost-effective form of management to arrest a global trend towards over-harvesting of food fish stocks.

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Chairman the Hon Virginia Chadwick said the results are very encouraging.

"These increases will benefit fish stocks, through both increased spill-over of adult and juvenile fish from green zones to zones open to fishing and through improved health of the reef ecosystem.

"This is positive news for both the tourism and fishing industries. The monitoring programme has shown the importance of green zones and why they are vital to the future of the reef."

Mrs Chadwick said the ongoing monitoring is a great example of collaboration between managers and researchers.

This collaborative project was supported by GBRMPA, Australian Research Council, JCU, and MTSRF (Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility), which replaces the very successful Co-operative Research Centres for coral reefs and tropical rainforests that operated in North Queensland from 1993 to 2006.

Source - http://www.aims.gov.au/pages/about/communications/waypoint/002/headlines-03.html


Australian Marine Science Association - supports protection zones

(Representing over 900 marine science experts nationally)

Fisheries stock assessments and models are extremely complex and frequently lack necessary information to reliably predict sustainable catches. No-take reserves [or protection zones] thus provide a “second line of defence should current management fail. Protected populations of exploited species may assist stock recovery outside a reserve in two ways:

  • through movement of mature individuals outside reserve boundaries; and
  • by dispersal of planktonic life stages beyond reserve boundaries by water currents which move through a reserve.

No-take reserves remove all fishing pressure from exploited stocks in a limited area. For some species in bays and inlets the size of the recreational catch is comparable to the commercial catch.

Research into no-take marine reserves has shown dramatic increases in size (and as a consequence, also in fecundity) and abundance of commercially exploited marine species within them. The effectiveness of reserves for specific fisheries requires location specific information.

Reference – AMSA position statement on marine protected areas – AMSA Bulletin 159, July 2002


260 European Marine Scientists Support Protection Zones

We believe that Fully Protected Marine Reserves [or protection zones] are essential for conservation, are necessary for the implementation of effective management of the sea, and have important benefits to scientific understanding of this environment.

Where marine reserves have been designated, they have been shown to result in long-standing and often rapid increases in the abundance, diversity and productivity of marine life, especially of species that were previously exploited. Marine reserves may benefit fisheries by the “spillover” of animals from inside the reserves and from the export of eggs and larvae to adjacent marine areas. Marine reserves also enable the development of more natural, extended population age structures that promote resilience to overfishing and are important to maintaining the integrity of marine ecosystems in the face of climate change.

In order to assure sufficient protection across the whole range of marine ecosystems it is necessary to establish a representative, replicated, networked and sustainable system of Fully Protected Marine Reserves. To be effective networks must, therefore, span large geographic distances and be of sufficient scale to protect against catastrophes and ensure the long-term health and stability of marine ecosystems.

Marine Reserves are essential to scientific understanding of marine ecosystems, and hence, to their management. They provide control areas for all direct human disturbances and more natural baselines for measurement of impacts. This enables scientists to obtain data that that are less confounded by human activities (e.g. separating natural variation from fishing effects) and acquire a greater understanding of the intrinsic processes of subject ecosystems.

Reference - European Scientists’ Consensus Statement on Marine Reserves - www.york.ac.uk/depts/eeem/gsp/mem/marine_reserves_consensus.pdf

 

 

 

Surfrider Foundation The Wilderness Society Bribie Island Environmental Protection Association Wildlife Preservation Society Australian Marine Conservation Society National Parks Association of Queensland Bayside Branch - Wildlife Preservation Society Gold Coast and Hinterland Environment Council

Getaway Cruising Oz Aquatec Friends of Sradbroke Island Go Dive Australia Friends of Peel Island Association Nautilus Scuba Centre Toowong
Web Manager , Web hosting: ozup.com Images copyright